Time to treatment with bridging intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment:subanalysis of the randomized controlled SWIFT-DIRECT trial.

    Auteurs
  • Thomas R Meinel
  • Johannes Kaesmacher
  • Lukas Buetikofer
  • Daniel Strbian
  • Omer Faruk Eker
  • Christophe Cognard
  • Pasquale Mordasini
  • Sandro Deppeler
  • Vitor Mendes Pereira
  • Jean François Albucher
  • Jean Darcourt
  • Romain Bourcier
  • Benoit Guillon
  • Chrysanthi Papagiannaki
  • Guillaume Costentin
  • Gerli Sibolt
  • Silja Räty
  • Benjamin Gory
  • Sébastien Richard
  • Jan Liman
  • Marielle Ernst
  • Marion Boulanger
  • Charlotte Barbier
  • Laura Mechtouff
  • Liqun Zhang
  • Gaultier Marnat
  • Igor Sibon
  • Omid Nikoubashman
  • Arno Reich
  • Arturo Consoli
  • David Weisenburger
  • Manuel Requena
  • Alvaro Garcia-Tornel
  • Suzana Saleme
  • Solène Moulin
  • Paolo Pagano
  • Guillaume Saliou
  • Emmanuel Carrera
  • Kevin Janot
  • Marti Boix
  • Raoul Pop
  • Lucie Della Schiava
  • Andreas Luft
  • Michel Piotin
  • Jean Christophe Gentric
  • Aleksandra Pikula
  • Waltraud Pfeilschifter
  • Marcel Arnold
  • Adnan Siddiqui
  • Michael T Froehler
  • Anthony J Furlan
  • René Chapot
  • Martin Wiesmann
  • Paolo Machi
  • Hans-Christoph Diener
  • Zsolt Kulcsar
  • Leo Bonati
  • Claudio Bassetti
  • Simon Escalard
  • David Liebeskind
  • Jeffrey L Saver
  • Urs Fischer
  • Jan Gralla

Source: Journal (source)J Neurointerv Surg

Publié le Date de publication

Résumé

AbstractBACKGROUND: We hypothesized that treatment delays might be an effect modifier regarding risks and benefits of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

METHODS: We used the dataset of the SWIFT-DIRECT trial, which randomized 408 patients to IVT+MT or MT alone. Potential interactions between assignment to IVT+MT and expected time from onset-to-needle (OTN) as well as expected time from door-to-needle (DTN) were included in regression models. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included mRS shift, mortality, recanalization rates, and (symptomatic) intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours.

RESULTS: We included 408 patients (IVT+MT 207, MT 201, median age 72 years (IQR 64-81), 209 (51.2%) female). The expected median OTN and DTN were 142 min and 54 min in the IVT+MT group and 129 min and 51 min in the MT alone group. Overall, there was no significant interaction between OTN and bridging IVT assignment regarding either the functional (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.30) and safety outcomes or the recanalization rates. Analysis of in-hospital delays showed no significant interaction between DTN and bridging IVT assignment regarding the dichotomized functional outcome (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.62), but the shift and mortality analyses suggested a greater benefit of IVT when in-hospital delays were short.

CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that the effect of bridging IVT on functional independence is modified by overall or in-hospital treatment delays. Considering its low power, this subgroup analysis could have missed a clinically important effect, and exploratory analysis of secondary clinical outcomes indicated a potentially favorable effect of IVT with shorter in-hospital delays. Heterogeneity of the IVT effect size before MT should be further analyzed in individual patient meta-analysis of comparable trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03192332.